Net Neutrality
This is a topic that is huge, it will have an affect on every internet user worldwide, it will cause fundamental change in this global network, yet it receives no news coverage and not many people are familiar with it nor will do anything about it.
For those of you in the dark, net neutrality is the name of a movement to keep content online free and open for access to all users. It has since become synonymous with the efforts by broadband access providers to limit internet access to its customers by restricting usage to select websites that will pay a premium to be accessible. Essentially they are trying to do the same thing with the internet that happened with cable access TV. A station pays the cable provider a premium at regular intervals, and in turn their content is shown on a specific channel on TV.
If this happens, then we would see 95% of internet websites vanish overnight. I know that may be an exaggeration, but at the same time it may be an optimistic estimate. Only the websites that could afford to pay the ISPs would remain online, and people like me are in no position to pay for a “channel” on this new subscription by site model.
As a libertarian, I am against most government controls on the economy, since the internet is a place of business and ISPs are business. However, in this case, I believe it is necessary to put government restrictions on ISPs to make sure all content is equally free to be accessible, and here’s why.
It would devastate a vast number of industries that rely on the free openness to the internet to operate. The following industries come to the top of my head: Web server hosts, domain name registration, small business web presence, web designers, independent programmers, freeware application development, small internet retailers, and hell, even the internet pornography industry would be devastated. Internet advertising would be destroyed and viral marketing would cease to exist. It would be impossible for any internet startup to gain moment without paying exorbitant amounts of money for subscription on the various ISPs. This incredible effect on the international economy that exists only online would be unacceptable by all institutions and should not be tolerated to come to pass.
Second, it goes against the very foundations of the World Wide Web. Ever since it first went up, it has been free and open access to all. All you did was pay for the access point from your local provider and there were no limitations or restrictions and where you could go or what you could see.
Basically, I see the internet as a giant outlet mall that spans the globe. A site pays “rent” on their shop to web hosts and domain registrars and they operate business as they see fit. The ISPs a basically the roads and walkways to allow us to get to the various outlet stores. By limiting access to a select few sites that pay for it, it would be like a security guard standing at the entrance, handing out access cards that only allow you to enter certain stores of their choosing. I would call that a restriction on the growth of capitalism and exploitation of both the companies operating on the web and also the end users. Sure it limits capitalistic opportunities of the ISPs, but for the purpose of the greater good, it is necessary for them to stay behind so that a great many others can survive.
Support Net Neutrality. Write your congressman and make sure this is forbidden. If you don’t live in the US, contact your representing MP or whatever legislative representative you may have, because this is a worldwide phenomenon that will stab the information superhighway in the back.



